http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/Dev/App_Themes/C9/images/feedimage.pnghttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/I knew it, I was righthttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/en-usSat, 03 Jan 2009 04:04:04 GMTSat, 03 Jan 2009 04:04:04 GMTEvNet (EvNet, Version=1.0.3713.3727, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null)did you see that cat again?http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=451048Sat, 03 Jan 2009 04:04:04 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=4510480http://channel9.msdn.com/451048/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0did you see that cat again?figuerres0http://channel9.msdn.com/451048/Trackback.aspxwelcome to the matrix :)<br>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=451040Sat, 03 Jan 2009 02:18:38 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=4510400http://channel9.msdn.com/451040/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0welcome to the matrix :)Ion Todirel0http://channel9.msdn.com/451040/Trackback.aspx"a small moment of joy and fun"<BR><BR>That's called the Einstein Marriage Constant. :Phttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=451037Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:58:59 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=4510370http://channel9.msdn.com/451037/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0"a small moment of joy and fun"That's called the Einstein Marriage Constant. :PHarlequin0http://channel9.msdn.com/451037/Trackback.aspxComing back to the bug: it's weird because the 5th page is gone if you go back to the fourth... it's like as if they give you a 5 out of 4 - a small moment of joy and fun - and then steal it again... :(http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=451032Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:17:40 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=4510320http://channel9.msdn.com/451032/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Coming back to the bug: it's weird because the 5th page is gone if you go back to the fourth... it's like as if they give you a 5 out of 4 - a small moment of joy and fun - and then steal it again... :(Christian Liensberger0http://channel9.msdn.com/451032/Trackback.aspx<blockquote><p>Rule 1: <i>We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances.</i></p> <p>Rule 2: <i>Therefore to the same natural effects we must, as far as possible, assign the same causes.</i></p> <p>Rule 3: <i>The qualities of bodies, which admit neither intensification nor remission of degrees, and which are found to belong to all bodies within the reach of our experiments, are to be esteemed the universal qualities of all bodies whatsoever.</i></p> <p>Rule 4: <i>In experimental philosophy we are to look upon propositions inferred by general induction from phenomena as accurately or very nearly true, notwithstanding any contrary hypothesis that may be imagined, till such time as other phenomena occur, by which they may either be made more accurate, or liable to exceptions.<br /></blockquote> <br /></p> <p>You gotta admit, impossible is nothing. :)</i></p>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=451029Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:14:27 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=4510290http://channel9.msdn.com/451029/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Rule 1: We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Rule 2: Therefore to the same natural effects we must, as far as possible, assign the same causes. Rule 3: The qualities of bodies, which admit neither intensification&#8230;Dorian Muthig0http://channel9.msdn.com/451029/Trackback.aspxLooks like a nice set of integrals... and if you look cosely you will see that they use TeX to do the formulas on Wikipedia :Phttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=451028Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:12:29 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=4510280http://channel9.msdn.com/451028/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Looks like a nice set of integrals... and if you look cosely you will see that they use TeX to do the formulas on Wikipedia :PChristian Liensberger0http://channel9.msdn.com/451028/Trackback.aspxW3bbo does neat formulas like this :P<BR><BR><IMG alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/5/d/6/5d66dccf599f6ab4b37fbcb748974200.png">http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=451027Sat, 03 Jan 2009 00:57:01 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=4510270http://channel9.msdn.com/451027/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0W3bbo does neat formulas like this :PHarlequin0http://channel9.msdn.com/451027/Trackback.aspxWith percentage you express portion, but 5 out of 4 is as real as 125% is real in some situations. For example you can get an extra hour on your laptop that would usually last no more than 4 hours by lowering display brightness. You got 5 out of 4 hours.<div><br></div><div>5 out of 4 sounds unnatural, but so are negative or complex numbers in most measurements that you can make in nature - you can't have -3 stones, your can't have a negative momentum, but that doesn't prevent us from using negative numbers when we feel like it. </div><div><br></div><div>5 out 4 is only another representation of a fraction, which is mathematically not problematical, it's just that in physical world many things can't go over 100%.</div>http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=451023Sat, 03 Jan 2009 00:11:34 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=4510230http://channel9.msdn.com/451023/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0With percentage you express portion, but 5 out of 4 is as real as 125% is real in some situations. For example you can get an extra hour on your laptop that would usually last no more than 4 hours by lowering display brightness. You got 5 out of 4 hours.5 out of 4 sounds unnatural, but so are&#8230;RoyalSchrubber0http://channel9.msdn.com/451023/Trackback.aspxMaybe w3bbo can do some of his l33t math skillz and prove that "5&nbsp;out of 4" is possible :)http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=451015Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:26:07 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=4510150http://channel9.msdn.com/451015/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Maybe w3bbo can do some of his l33t math skillz and prove that "5&nbsp;out of 4" is possible :)Harlequin0http://channel9.msdn.com/451015/Trackback.aspxCongratulations, you found the page N out of N-1 problem that's been here since the v4 launch.http://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=450987Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:48:10 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=4509870http://channel9.msdn.com/450987/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0Congratulations, you found the page N out of N-1 problem that's been here since the v4 launch.Bas0http://channel9.msdn.com/450987/Trackback.aspxlolhttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=450981Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:30:44 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/forums/Coffeehouse/450966-I-knew-it-I-was-right/?CommentID=4509810http://channel9.msdn.com/450981/WebViewBug.aspx?EVT=0lolLee Dale0http://channel9.msdn.com/450981/Trackback.aspx